Figure 1. Overview of TurboWAM performance. (a) Visual comparison of successful task execution, highlighting the fast task completion of TurboWAM. (b) Comparison of inference time vs. success rate on LIBERO. TurboWAM achieves a better trade-off between inference time and success rate compared to state-of-the-art methods. TurboWAM* and Fast-WAM* denote versions accelerated using torch.compile with CUDA Graph replay, with compilation and graph capture performed during warm-up before model inference measurement.
Figure 2. Overview of the TurboWAM framework. The structured world representation aggregation module adaptively fuses representations from different world model layers according to the current action denoising state. The structured action supervision mechanism modulates action-supervision gradients across world model layers during the backward pass. Together, these complementary designs reduce inference latency while maintaining competitive task success rates.
Table 1. Quantitative comparison with state-of-the-art methods on LIBERO and RoboTwin 2.0.
Table 2. Quantitative comparison with state-of-the-art methods on LIBERO-Plus across seven perturbation categories.
Figure 3. Qualitative comparison of task execution. Each row illustrates the progression of task execution from left to right.
Figure 4. Additional qualitative comparisons of task execution. Each row illustrates the progression of task execution from left to right.
Figure 5. Additional qualitative comparisons of task execution. Each row illustrates the progression of task execution from left to right.
Figure 6. Additional qualitative comparisons of task execution. Each row illustrates the progression of task execution from left to right.
If you find this work useful, please cite our paper: